Kent v. Erie Railroad
Kent v. Erie Railroad
158 A.D. 951; 143 N.Y.S. 1124
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. AJI concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the exception to the charge respecting plaintiff’s right to board the train was well taken.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.