Harris v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.
Opinion of the Court
The action is brought for a reformation of a policy of burglar insurance by the inclusion therein of a statement in amendment of the warranties, statements and agreements contained
The defendant, being a corporation which acts only through its representatives, is entitled to know the names of the persons in its employ or representing it, with whom the plaintiff’s assignors claim they made the special agreement in question. (Sittig v. Cohen, 130 App. Div. 689.)
It appears from the defective bill of particulars heretofore served that one Harry A. Wilkus and one Bernard Frank are in a position to furnish the plaintiff with information concerning many of the matters upon which particulars are sought.
The order appealed from will, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for a further bill of particulars granted, with ten dollars costs.
Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Soott and Hotchkiss, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.