Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Dutcher v. Wanamaker

Dutcher v. Wanamaker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 10, 1913
139 N.Y.S. 392 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Frank'V. Johnson, of New York City, for appellant., Robert H. Roy, of Brooklyn, for respondent.

Dutcher v. Wanamaker

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the authority of Rumetsch v. Wanamaker, 139 N. Y. Supp. 385, and Mack v. Wanamaker, 139 N. Y. Supp. 391, decided herewith.

JENKS, P. J., and BURR, THOBIAS, and CARR, JJ., concur. HIRSCHBERG> J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.