Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Koropjeck v. Bohack

Koropjeck v. Bohack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 15, 1914 · Hlie, Iegraham, McLattg
160 A.D. 924
Koropjeck v. Bohack

Opinion of the Court

No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. ; Ingraham, P. J., and McLaughlin, J., dissented.

Dissenting Opinion

Iegraham, P. J., and McLattg-hlie, J.,

dissent on the ground that it was error to refuse to charge the defendant’s fifth request, which is as follows: “ The fact that Bennett was not called by either side raises no more presumption in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant than it does in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.