Justice v. Justice
Justice v. Justice
163 A.D. 877
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, having been denied the right to frame issues because his complaint was not definite enough and was too general, should now be allowed to make his complaint more definite so that he may comply with the rule laid down by the judge at Special Term and have issues framed. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed and the motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, and motion granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.