Housel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff made out a prima facie ease under the Federal Safety Appliance Act and the Federal Employers’ Liability Aet.† Kate M. 0’Neill, Respondent, v. John A. Dicks, Appellant.—Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.