Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Epstein v. Goldsmith

Epstein v. Goldsmith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1914
165 A.D. 967
Epstein v. Goldsmith

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified as follows: First: The complaint should be made more definite and certain; (1) paragraphs 3 and 4, by specifying with more and sufficient particularity when defendant Lewis is claimed to have fraudulently transferred the property therein described; (3) by specifying in similar manner the character of the transfers to and source of title of said Lewis to said property; (3) paragraph 8, by similarly specifying to whom the property and moneys with which the bonds were purchased belonged. Second. The entire 9th paragraph should be stricken out as irrelevant. As so modified the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. ' Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants. Order to be settled on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.