In re Howell
In re Howell
166 A.D. 894; 150 N.Y.S. 1090
Opinion of the Court
Order modified by striking out the costs as we cannot say that the administratrix has unreasonably resisted the claim. The terms of the order for payment should be in the form of a final order foreclosing a lien (Matter of King, 168 N. Y. 53), without the present liability for contempt. As thus modified order affirmed, without costs to either party. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.