Koropjeck v. Bohack
Koropjeck v. Bohack
145 N.Y.S. 1129
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, J., dissent, on the ground that it was error to refuse to charge the defendant’s fifth request, which is as follows: “The fact that Bennet was . not called by either side raises no more presumption in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant than it does in favor of the defendant and' against the plaintiff.’!
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.