Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Feinstein v. Jacobson

Feinstein v. Jacobson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 6, 1914
146 N.Y.S. 525; 161 A.D. 121 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

David L. Podell, of New York City, for appellant., Meyer D. Siegel, of New York City, for respondent.

Feinstein v. Jacobson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The fact,that the agreement provided, in case of its violation by defendant, he should “be liable in damages and breach of contract” does not, in view of the circumstances, deprive plaintiff of the right to equitable relief. Lewis v. Gollner, 129 N. Y. 227, 234, 29 N. E. 81, 26 Am. St. Rep. 516; Diamond Match Co. v. Roeber, 106 N. Y. 473, 486, 13 N. E. 419, 60 Am. Rep. 464. Defendant’s counsel concedes that the demurrer is bad, inasmuch as it did not specify the parties failure to join whom constituted the defect. This defect in pleading could not be cured on the motion, under Code Civ. Proc. § 768.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with costs, and the demurrer overruled, with $10 costs, with leave to the defendant to withdraw the demurrer, and to answer upon payment of costs in this court and in the court below.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.