Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Dessar v. Hirsch

Dessar v. Hirsch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 29, 1914
147 N.Y.S. 1107 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

`Sidney Bernheim, of New York City, for appellants., Emanuel J. Myers, of New York City, for respondent.

Dessar v. Hirsch

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We think there was a question of fact as to whether the person writing the letter was an agent of the decedent gad authorized to make a lease of the property for her, which was fairly submitted to the jury, and its verdict should not be disturbed. It follows that the determination of the Appellate Term, reversing the order denying a motion for a new trial and dismissing the complaint, should be reversed with costs in this court and in the Appellate `term, and the order of the City Court affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.