Matheson v. Mente
Matheson v. Mente
147 N.Y.S. 1126; 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6523
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
Inasmuch as George J. Stainton, the younger, was not a party to this action, the judgment as entered at Special Term would be no legal bar against him or those claiming under him, and plainti~ would not be protected thereby by acquiescence in the same. The judgment should be modified, by providing for a foreclosure and. sala for the full amount due thereon, with interest and costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1126.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.