Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 5, 1914 · McLaughlin, Scott

148 N.Y.S. 41; 162 A.D. 794 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

George J. McDonnell, of New York City, for appellant., Wales F. Severance, of New York City, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J.

This action was tried with that of Aida Cohn, who was plaintiff’s wife.

*42For the reason stated in the case of said Aida Cohn against the same defendant, 148 N. Y. Supp. 39, this judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

INGRAHAM, P. J., and CLARKE and HOTCHKISS, JJ., concur.

Dissenting Opinion

McLAUGHLIN, J.

(dissenting). This action was brought to recover damages for loss of services of plaintiff’s wife. It was tried with her action to recover damages for her injuries. Plaintiff had a recovery of $1,000.

For the reasons stated by me in the opinion in Aida Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Company (decided herewith), I think this judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.