Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Teeter v. Daniel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 10, 1914

148 N.Y.S. 1146; 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7593 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Anna K. Daniel, of New York City, pro se. Isaac A. Hiller, of New York City, for respondent,

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

This action having been reguiariy brought on for trial at Special Term, and a judgment having been rendered in favor of the plaintiff, it is quite evident that none of tins facts upon which the application to the Special Term, for the hearing of motions was based would justify that court m vacating, the judgment or setting aside the proceedings, TIlls order> therefore, must be affirmed, without costs-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.