Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Lamson Co. v. Butler & Maclaren, Inc.

Lamson Co. v. Butler & Maclaren, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 30, 1914
149 N.Y.S. 557 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William L. Obrion, of New York City, for appellants., John D. Lindsay, of New York City, for respondent.

Lamson Co. v. Butler & Maclaren, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The provision requiring the production of the books and papers seems to be unnecessary and would entail a great hardship upon the corporation. The order for the examination of the defendants should therefore be modified, by striking out the provision for the production of books and papers, leaving the plaintiff to obtain such books and papers as may be necessary for the examination by subpoena duces tecum at the time of the examination.

The order should therefore be modified, as above indicated, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.