Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Brand v. Hasbrouck

Brand v. Hasbrouck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 6, 1914
149 N.Y.S. 1072; 165 A.D. 924; 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7865 (New York Supplement)
Brand v. Hasbrouck

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

No written notice of this accounting proceeding ordered against the receiver was given to the surety on the receiver’s official bond, under Code Civ. Proc. § 715, which requirement means a notice in writing. Erving v. City of New York, 131 N. Y. 133, 29 N. E. 1101. Hence the accounting proceedings, and the refereb’s findings, with the orders of the court made thereon, as against the surety, had no effect. Stratton v. City Trust, etc., Co., 86 App: Div. 551, 83 N. Y. Supp. 780. The evidence of the receiver’s default and misfeasance being based only on these accounting proceedings left the complaint totally unsupported as to the surety, so that it was rightly dismissed. The judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.