In re Ball

The decrees of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings County are affirmed, with *1075costs. We are constrained to hold that the stipulation, which shows that the appellant has recovered and returned to the estate the amount of tne second mortgage investments, cannot be considered upon this appeal, because it appears tnat such recovery and restoration occurred aner the accounting and after the decrees of the .surrogate were entered. See, also, 161 App. Div. 946, 146 N. Y. Supp. 1083.