Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
Glendening v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
150 N.Y.S. 1088
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
Accepting the contention of the plaintiff that he attempted to and did set out but one cause of action in his complaint, paragraphs 8, 9, all but the first six lines of paragraph 19, and paragraph 22 are irrelevant and redundant to said cause of action so claimed to be alleged. The order appealed from should therefore be modified, by providing that the matter indicated should be stricken from the complaint, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.