Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz

Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1915
169 A.D. 957; 153 N.Y.S. 1120
Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz

Opinion of the Court

It would be difficult to conceive of a case of more unreasonable neglect on the part of the plaintiff herself and of her attorney to prosecute than appeared here. (Meyer v. Crimmins, 135 App. Div. 911.) The plaintiff has by no means successfully explained that delay. Therefore, the order-appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment is denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.