Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz
Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz
169 A.D. 957; 153 N.Y.S. 1120
Opinion of the Court
It would be difficult to conceive of a case of more unreasonable neglect on the part of the plaintiff herself and of her attorney to prosecute than appeared here. (Meyer v. Crimmins, 135 App. Div. 911.) The plaintiff has by no means successfully explained that delay. Therefore, the order-appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment is denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.