Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

People v. Di Stefano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 30, 1915

170 A.D. 600; 156 N.Y.S. 679; 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6085

Counsel

Charles L. Fasullo, for the appellant., Harry G. Anderson, Assistant District Attorney [James C. Cropsey, District Attorney, with him on the brief], for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This court has jurisdiction of the appeal. (People v. Fowler, 166 App. Div. 605.) The evidence was sufficient to warrant *601the court in adjudging that it is for the welfare of the defendant that she be placed in a reformatory. (Consolidation Act [Laws of 1882, chap. 410], § 1466, subd. 1, as amd. by Laws of 1886, chap. 353; Laws of 1903, chap. 436; Laws of 1904, chap. 537, and Laws of 1914, chap. 445; Greater N". Y". Charter [Laws of 1897, chap. 378; Laws of 1901, chap. 466], §§ 1608, 1609, 1610.)

The judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered in that part thereof designated by law as the Children’s Court in Kings county, should he affirmed.

Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred. .

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered in that part thereof designated by law as the Children’s Court in Kings county, affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.