Deebach v. Robert Gair Co.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the trial court erred in submitting to the jury, as a specification of defendant’s negligence, the question of defendant’s employees having had and followed the custom of leaving the elevator doors open, because there was no evidence tending to establish that such custom was a proximate cause of this accident; also upon the ground that that court erred in submitting to the jury the ordinance
See Building Code of City of New York, § 95.—[Rep.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.