Hirsh & Schofield, Inc. v. Gusmer
Hirsh & Schofield, Inc. v. Gusmer
171 A.D. 935; 156 N.Y.S. 1127
Opinion of the Court
Without determining whether or not the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction by final judgment after a trial of the action, we think the court was justified in refusing to continue the temporary injunction. The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Smith, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.