Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Sanford v. Hart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 23, 1915

152 N.Y.S. 869 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Arthur Furber, of New York City, for appellant., J. Sidney Bernstein, of New York City, for respondents.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The complaint alleged a cause of action against the defendant Max M. Hart individually, for the recovery of a sum of money; and the defendant Max M. Hart, not having answered that complaint, is in default, and the plaintiff is entitled as matter of right, upon that default, to relief as against the defendant Max M. Hart individually.

We are entirely satisfied with the disposition of the trial judge as to the cause of action alleged against Frieda Hart and Jeanette C. Jeffe.

The judgment appealed from must be modified, by directing a recovery gainst M. M. Hart, Incorporated, and Max- M. Hart individually, for the sum of'$2,888.50, and as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the defendants Frieda Hart and Jeanette C. Jeffe as against the plaintiff. Settle order on notice,.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.