Geelan v. Bahr
Geelan v. Bahr
152 N.Y.S. 1112; 168 A.D. 898
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
Dissenting Opinion
I think that the court erred in refusing to charge the jury “that, if the jury find that this accident happened entirely by reason of the fact that the left-hand horse shied and forced the wagon over against the car, then under the issues presented in this case their verdict must be for the defendant Bahr.” I therefore dissent, and vote to reverse the judgment and order appealed from, and for a new trial as to the defendant Bahr.
SCOTT, J., concurs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.