Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

O'neill v. Goodman Contracting Co.

O'neill v. Goodman Contracting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 4, 1915
153 N.Y.S. 727 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Alfred E. Holmes, of New York City, for appellant., Reuben L. Haskell, of New York City (Joseph A. Burdeau, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

O'neill v. Goodman Contracting Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Under the charge of the court the jury were instructed that the plaintiff could not recover unless they found that the defendant left a plank that was so defective or broken that her foot and leg went through it. β€œIt was a defective plank, and her leg went through the hole, or she is not in court.” That, therefore, is the law of the case. The finding of the jury that there was such a defective plank, and that the accident occurred in the way described by the plaintiff, is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.

Such finding, and the judgment and order appealed from, should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.