Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Botassis v. Thanasules

Botassis v. Thanasules
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 5, 1915
155 N.Y.S. 405 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Roger Foster, of New York City, for appellant., Samuel F. Frank, of New York City, for respondent.

Botassis v. Thanasules

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The action being merely to recover possession of the bank book, there was no question presented to the court which justified it in entertaining an action for an accounting between the parties.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs, without prejudice to an action by the defendant to determine whether there was a copartnership, and for an accounting as between the parties.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.