Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Barclay v. Barclay

Barclay v. Barclay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 5, 1915
155 N.Y.S. 632 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

D. Cady Herrick, of Albany, for appellant., Chester A. Jayne, of New York City, for respondent.

Barclay v. Barclay

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

[1,2] We are of the opinion that, in view of plaintiff’s special property in the subject-matter of this litigation, she is entitled to- an examination of defendant’s books of account, and that she is not called upon to accept the defendant’s conclusion as to the results which such an examination would disclose. The order should be so- drawn as to- interfere as little as possible with the conduct of the business, and to that end will be settled on notice.

The order appealed from is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.