Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Devonish v. Imperial Investing Corp.

Devonish v. Imperial Investing Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 19, 1915
155 N.Y.S. 787 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Walter L. Glenney, of New York City, for appellant., Charles W. Gould, of New York City, for respondent._^

Devonish v. Imperial Investing Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The finding that the defendant was negligent is without evidence to sustain it. Whatever negligence there was was that of the other elevator employé, who was a fellow employé, and was neither a superintendent nor charged with any duty of superintendence for the defendant. For such negligence, therefore, the defendant is not responsible. The evidence of the incompetency of this fellow employé had no relation to the accident, as it only related to failure to stop at the proper floor or in the management of the elevator.

The finding that the defendant was negligent is therefore reversed, the judgment and order are reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.