Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916

People v. Kingsley

People v. Kingsley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1916 · Kellogg
173 A.D. 985; 158 N.Y.S. 1125
People v. Kingsley

Dissenting Opinion

Kellogg, P. J. (dissenting):

It was reversible error to receive, over the defendant’s objection, the evidence of Mrs. May that her sister, the complainant, after she discovered her pregnancy, two months after the alleged offense, stated to her that the defendant was responsible for her condition. (Baccio v. People, 41 N. Y. 265; People v. Clemons, 37 Hun, 580; People v. O'Sullivan, 104 N. Y. 481; People v. Friedman, 139 App. Div. 795.) Howard, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.