Fleischer v. Fleischer
Fleischer v. Fleischer
174 A.D. 918
Opinion of the Court
The undisputed and unexplained facts burden plaintiff’s application with at least this infirmity: She is amply able financially to prosecute her suit and to support herself during its pendency. (Collins v. Collins, 80 N. Y. 1; Lake v. Lake, 194 id. 179.) Order reversed and motion denied, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.