Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916

Skinner v. Hamilton

Skinner v. Hamilton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 15, 1916 · Scott
175 A.D. 884
Skinner v. Hamilton

Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

The order appealed from was clearly unauthorized. If the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for defendant instead of dismissing the complaint (a question which we do not decide and cannot decide upon the record before us) the defendant’s remedy was by appeal and not by a motion before another justice, sitting in Special Term, to vacate the judgment and order a new trial. The granting of such a motion was error. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Dowling and Smith, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.