Miner v. Pietraschke
Miner v. Pietraschke
175 A.D. 967
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that irrespective of whether the contract is a conditional sale or not, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the payments which were due. The evidence shows that defendant was not precluded from exercising his option to purchase; on the contrary, that the plaintiff was holding the machine for the defendant, so
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.