Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916

In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.

In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 26, 1916
159 N.Y.S. 230; 173 A.D. 962 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. R. Hager, of New York City, for appellant., Nelson L. ICeach, of New York City, for respondent.

In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the ground that no leave to sue is necessary. Pierce v. Wilson, 118 App. Div. 662, 103 N. Y. Supp. 678; Vitelli v. May, 120 App. Div. 448, 104 N. Y. Supp. 1082. Order filed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.