Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916

Skinner v. Hamilton

Skinner v. Hamilton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 20, 1916 · Scott
160 N.Y.S. 993; 175 A.D. 884 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. Franklin Tausch, of New York City, for appellant., Alexander Thain, of New York City, for respondent.

Skinner v. Hamilton

Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J.

The order appealed from was clearly unauthorized. If the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for defendant instead of dismissing the complaint (a question which we do not decide and cannot decide upon the record before us), the plaintiff’s remedy was by appeal and not by a motion before another justice, sitting in Special Term, to vacate the judgment and order a new trial. The granting of such a motion was error.

Order appealed from reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.