Harburger v. Campbell
Opinion of the Court
The question involved in this appeal is substantially the same as that involved in the case of Younger v. Campbell (177 App. Div. 403), decided herewith.
The premises involved in this action are No. 358 Bowery. The lease was made April 11, 1911, by Charles Schlang, as owner, for a period of five years from May 1, 1912, at the yearly rental of $1,200 and the action is brought to recover $100 rent for the month of February, 1916. These premises were used by the tenant in conjunction with the two adjoining premises as a lodging house. The fire commissioner issued his orders for the doing of certain work upon the premises on February 24, March 24 and September 7, 1915. Upon the failure of the owner to comply therewith he made his order under sections 775 and 778 of the Greater' New York charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466, added by Laws of 1911, chap. 899, as amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 459)
For the reasons assigned in the case of Younger v. Campbell (supra),the determination and judgment appealed from will be reversed, with costs and disbursements in this court and at the
Scott, Laughlin, Smith and Davis, JJ., concurred.
Determination and judgment reversed, with costs in this court and at the Appellate Term, and judgment ordered dismissing complaint, with costs.
Since amd. by Laws of 1916, chap. 503.— [Rep.
See Cosby’s Code Ord. (Anno. 1914) 217, § 93. Now Building Code, § 426. See Cosby’s Code Ord. (Anno, 1915) 105, § 426.— [Rep,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.