Mutual Life Insurance v. Rothschild
Mutual Life Insurance v. Rothschild
177 A.D. 883
Opinion of the Court
No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Page, Davis and Shearn, JJ.; Page, J., dissented.
Dissenting Opinion
I dissent on the ground that increasing the rate of interest from four and one-half to five per cent and the cancellation of the privilege of prepayment having been made without the knowledge or consent of the original bondsmen, or their personal representatives, relieved them from liability for a deficiency judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.