Ahrens v. Rosenfeld
Ahrens v. Rosenfeld
178 A.D. 905
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The facts.as stated in the complaint and as admitted by the demurrer, do not show receipt of the money for the purpose of conversion, or refusal to surrender the same to the plaintiff’s employer, or any demand therefor, and the history of the transaction intermediate the receipt of the money to the application for the warrant is absent. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.