In re Fiske
In re Fiske
181 A.D. 953
Opinion of the Court
Motions for stays denied, without costs. Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Stapleton, J., dissented upon the ground that the record fails to show that there are before the board of canvassers the data prescribed by statute
See Election Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 17; Laws of 1909, chap. 22), ยง 514, as amd. by Laws of 1917, chap. 815.โ [Rep.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.