Sofianopoulo v. Standard Commercial Tobacco Co.
Opinion of the Court
This action is brought to recover the sum of $14,100-claimed to be due from defendant to plaintiff as commissions upon the sale of certain Grecian tobacco. An amended complaint, verified November 5, 1917, was served containing two paragraphs marked “ Seventh ” and ■“ Ninth.” A motion having been made to strike out these two paragraphs as irrelevant and redundant, it was granted and an order made December 24, 1917, striking out the paragraphs in question and further directing that “ plaintiff serve an amended complaint in accordance with the -terms of this order,” within twenty days. No appeal was taken from this order, but in apparent compliance therewith plaintiff served a further amended complaint, verified December 24, 1917, differing in various particulars from the prior amended complaint, and containing the “ Ninth ” paragraph of the latter (which had been ordered stricken out by the court), alleged in a slightly different form as paragraph “ Eighth ” of the present complaint. This new amended complaint was not a compliance with the order of the court, but an evasion thereof. All that plaintiff had the right to do under
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.