In re the Designation of Travis
Opinion of the Court
I vote to reverse upon the ground that the office of the Secretary of State is common to the State, and is not limited to the county of Albany; and that when the Secretary of State receives a petition, his function and act are not confined
Putnam, J., concurred.
Concurring Opinion
The Secretary of State is a State officer. (Pub. Off. Law, § 2.)
Mills, J., concurred with Thomas, J., and also voted to .reverse upon the following grounds: First, that the term “ acknowledgment ” in section 43 of the Election Law
See Consol. Laws, chap. 47 (Laws of 1909, chap. 51), § 2.— [Rep.
See Consol. Laws, chap. 17 (Laws of 1909, chap. 22), § 48, added by Laws of 1911, chap. 891, as amd. by Laws of 1917, chaps. 703, 723, 778; Id. §§ 50, 52, added by Laws of 1911, chap. 891, as amd. by Laws of 1913, chap. 820 — [Rep.
Concurring Opinion
I am firmly of opinion that section 11 of the General Construction Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 22; Laws of 1909, chap. 27) does not require a clerk’s certification to any paper to be filed in the office of the Secretary of State. In my opinion the language of section 11 of the General Construction Law is met by the provisions of section 306 of the Real Property Law
Order reversed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.