Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918

Courtney v. McArdle

Courtney v. McArdle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 15, 1918
185 A.D. 910
Courtney v. McArdle

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We think that under the facts and circumstances presented by the record in this case, the motion for suppressing the deposition of the plaintiffs’ witness, William S. McKay, should not have been granted. The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs All concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.