Courtney v. McArdle
Courtney v. McArdle
185 A.D. 910
Opinion of the Court
We think that under the facts and circumstances presented by the record in this case, the motion for suppressing the deposition of the plaintiffs’ witness, William S. McKay, should not have been granted. The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs All concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.