Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918

Tolishus v. Rudolph Wublitzer Co.

Tolishus v. Rudolph Wublitzer Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1918
186 A.D. 935
Tolishus v. Rudolph Wublitzer Co.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that there is a failure of proof in this case that the plaintiff became “ the successor in interest of the Lyceum Amusement Co., Inc.,” and, therefore, the plaintiff cannot maintain this action for damages, even if there was a failure upon the part of the defendant to give the notice required by the statute,* justifying a retaking of the piano and a sale thereof. All concurred.

See Pers. Prop. Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 41; Laws of 1909, chap. 45), § 65 et seq.— [Rep.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.