Crowell v. Crowell

We think that the defendant is entitled to the alimony pendente lite, as determined by the Special Term, and to a counsel fee (Waterman v. Waterman, 147 App. Div. 464), but that the amount thereof should be reduced *962to $250. The order is thus modified, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.