Kokotoff v. Sharer
Kokotoff v. Sharer
188 A.D. 894
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., voted for reversal for the purpose of maintaining .his dissent in Goldberg v. Borden’s Condensed Milk Co. (185 App. Div. 222) until that question is passed upon by the Court of Appeals.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.