Maisel v. Shanholt
Maisel v. Shanholt
189 A.D. 831; 179 N.Y.S. 292; 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4769
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff has mistaken his remedy. The option to renew for another two years, if exercised in time, needed no new lease for the additional term. (Orr v. Doubleday, Page & Co.,
' Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.
Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.