H. Muller & Co. v. Effangee Tobacco Co.
Opinion of the Court
Upon the amended complaint and the amended answer it appears that the plaintiff’s assignor made a contract to purchase from the defendant a certain quantity of tobacco which was to conform to certain specifications named in the
Defendant thereafter demanded the tobacco. The plaintiff’s assignor refused to deliver the same, except upon payment of the $7,000, and thereupon the defendant brought a replevin action to recover this tobacco, reciting the facts that have been hereinbefore alleged.
While the replevin action was pending the plaintiff brings this action to recover the $7,000 as paid upon a contract thereafter rescinded, and it attached this tobacco as the property of the defendant. These facts are all admitted. The allegation of the defendant is that the tobacco fully conformed to the contract made with the plaintiff’s assignor. Nevertheless, they had accepted the rescission, first, by selling the tobacco to other parties, and secondly, by bringing their action in replevin. This operates as an acceptance of the rescission. A rescission accepted entitles the parties to be put in statu quo in respect of the contract and entitles the plaintiff to recover all moneys paid thereon.
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Page and Merrell, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.