Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920

Schwen v. Kerr

Schwen v. Kerr
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 6, 1920 · Smith
190 A.D. 815; 180 N.Y.S. 545; 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4259

Counsel

Richmond J. Reese, for the appellant., James N. Rosenberg of counsel [Satterlee, Canfield & Stone, attorneys], for the respondents.

Schwen v. Kerr

Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

For reasons stated in the opinion of Heaphy v. Kerr (190 App. Div. 810), handed down herewith, the judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Page and Merrell, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.