In re Bronx Parkway Commission

This proceeding was instituted to have fixed the compensation to be paid for certain real property acquired by the *388Bronx Parkway Commission pursuant to chapter 594 of the Laws of 1907, as amended by chapter 757 of the Laws of 1913. The Commission was unable to purchase the lands described in the act, and condemnation proceedings were accordingly instituted under the act which provides (§ 13) that such lands shall be acquired “by condemnation proceedings instituted by said Bronx Parkway Commission in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure for the condemnation of real property for like purposes.” After the proceedings were commenced but during the progress thereof and prior to the report, section 13 of the act was amended (Laws of 1916, chap. 599) so as to provide that such lands shall be acquired “ by condemnation proceedings instituted and carried on by said Bronx Parkway Commission, in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure for the condemnation of real property for like purposes, except as herein otherwise provided.” The Bronx Parkway Commission became seized of the lands upon filing the oaths of the commissioners of appraisal. The commissioners of appraisal have made and filed their report and the same has been duly confirmed. The order confirming the same grants costs to the owners of the land condemned and makes them certain allowances. Thereafter an order was made directing the comptroller of the city of New York to pay interest upon said costs and allowances and it is from this order that the Bronx Parkway Commission appeals.

The act under which the proceeding is had provides for the payment of interest upon the awards but makes no such provision as to costs and allowances, although costs and allowances are specifically mentioned therein. The allowance of interest is based upon- the provisions of sections 3373 and 1211 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which, so far as material, read as follows:

“ § 3373. Upon the entry of the final order, the same shall be attached to the judgment-roll in the proceeding, and the amount directed to be paid, either as compensation to the owners, or for the costs or expenses of the proceeding, shall be docketed as a judgment against the person who is directed to pay the same, and it shall have all the force and effect of a money judgment in an action in the Supreme Court, and collec*389tion thereof may be enforced by execution and by the same proceedings as judgments for the recovery of money in the Supreme Court may be enforced under the provisions of this act.”

“ § 1211. A judgment for a sum of money, rendered in a court of record, or not of record, or a judgment rendered in a court of record, directing the payment of money, bears interest from the time when it is entered.”

Section 3373 is not applicable, because that has reference to an award which maybe enforced as a money judgment, and the award in this proceeding cannot be so enforced. The awards, costs and allowances herein are to be paid within three calendar months, “ and in default thereof, said persons, corporations or parties, respectively, may at any time or times after application first made by him or them to the comptroller of the city of New York for payment thereof, sue for and recover the same, with lawful interest, as aforesaid, and costs of suit.” (See Bronx Parkway Act, § 15, subd. h, as amd. by Laws of 1916, chap. 599.) The interest herein referred to is the interest upon the awards. At the conclusion of the action thus provided for the claim against the city becomes a judgment with all the incidents of a judgment, among which interest is included. Prior to the recovery of this judgment the award and costs are merely a claim against the city. The awards bear interest because the statute so provides and because it would also be inequitable to deprive the owner of his land without paying the purchase price and not to give him interest on such unpaid purchase price. (Matter of New York Municipal R. Corp. v. Holliday, 189 App. Div. 814; affd., 228 N. Y. 561.)

The statute does not provide for interest on costs and allowances, and there is no equitable reason for such interest. The award in this proceeding being a mere claim against the city, it bears only such interest as is expressly ^provided by statute until a demand for payment is made as provided for in the statute in question and in section 261 of the Greater New York charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466, as amd. by Laws of 1912, chap. 452). Until demand is made under that section the claim against a municipality, although liquidated and due at a definite date, does not bear interest. (Taylor v. Mayor, 67 N. Y. 87; Sweeny v. City of New York, 173 id. 414; O’ Keeffe v. City of New York, 176 id. 297; Smith v. Board of *390Education, 208 id. 84; Leopold v. City of New York, 184 App. Div. 244.) Under the situation here presented the costs and allowances did not bear interest. Section 1211 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply, as that relates only to interest upon a judgment and these costs and allowances are not contained in a judgment in accordance with section 3373 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Jenks, P. J., Mills, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.