Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920

Weed v. Brazill

Weed v. Brazill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 14, 1920 · Smith
192 A.D. 71; 182 N.Y.S. 355; 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436

Counsel

Gustav Lange, Jr., for the appellants., Edwin Welling Cady of counsel [Harold Swain, attorney], for the respondents.

Weed v. Brazill

Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

It follows from the reasoning in Brazill v. Weed (192 App. Div. 66) that this order was properly issued, and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Dowling, Laughlin and Merrell, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.