Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920

Glueck v. Tull

Glueck v. Tull
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 28, 1920
192 A.D. 82; 182 N.Y.S. 393; 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7439

Counsel

Harry E. Herman of counsel [A. O. Ernst with him on the brief; Herman & Ernst, attorneys], for the appellant., Leo G. Rose, for the respondents.

Glueck v. Tull

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

For the reasons stated in Glueck v. Tull (192 App. Div. 81), decided herewith, the order will be modified by striking therefrom subdivision 3, which requires a stipulation to try the issues before a referee, and inserting in lieu thereof that the case be restored to the trial calendar, and may be placed on the day calendar for trial on two days’ notice, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.

Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Greenbaum, JJ., concur.

Order modified as indicated in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.